<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Huliganov TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://huliganov.tv/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://huliganov.tv</link>
	<description>Language and Travel - &#34;Turn the camera on and something will happen&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why did God create the world knowing that it would fall into sin? (from a private conversation, by kind permission) by Viktor D. Huliganov</title>
		<link>http://huliganov.tv/2013/04/22/why-did-god-create-the-world-knowing-that-it-would-fall-into-sin-from-a-private-conversation-by-kind-permission/comment-page-1/#comment-15938</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Viktor D. Huliganov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huliganov.tv/?p=3405#comment-15938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would just change the I in your final word to an O. God shows in my view His love in the way He offers us forgiveness and union but then leaves it to us to choose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would just change the I in your final word to an O. God shows in my view His love in the way He offers us forgiveness and union but then leaves it to us to choose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why did God create the world knowing that it would fall into sin? (from a private conversation, by kind permission) by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://huliganov.tv/2013/04/22/why-did-god-create-the-world-knowing-that-it-would-fall-into-sin-from-a-private-conversation-by-kind-permission/comment-page-1/#comment-15925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 10:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huliganov.tv/?p=3405#comment-15925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[God has given us free will and that is important in understanding why he has created us.  It is through free will that we can choose good or evil.  God wants us to do good but it has to be our decision.  To a certain extent we entertain God.  If one is omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent it might get a little boring.  Creating beings that have free will ought to keep things lively.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God has given us free will and that is important in understanding why he has created us.  It is through free will that we can choose good or evil.  God wants us to do good but it has to be our decision.  To a certain extent we entertain God.  If one is omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent it might get a little boring.  Creating beings that have free will ought to keep things lively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 30 Languages to learn for 2050 by Viktor D. Huliganov</title>
		<link>http://huliganov.tv/2011/02/24/1802/comment-page-1/#comment-15912</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Viktor D. Huliganov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huliganov.tv/?p=1802#comment-15912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great response. Thanks for adding your voice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great response. Thanks for adding your voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 30 Languages to learn for 2050 by Loup Solitaire</title>
		<link>http://huliganov.tv/2011/02/24/1802/comment-page-1/#comment-15911</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loup Solitaire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huliganov.tv/?p=1802#comment-15911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;3.&quot; not &quot;2.&quot; for French, my mistake.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;3.&#8221; not &#8220;2.&#8221; for French, my mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 30 Languages to learn for 2050 by Loup Solitaire</title>
		<link>http://huliganov.tv/2011/02/24/1802/comment-page-1/#comment-15910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loup Solitaire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huliganov.tv/?p=1802#comment-15910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Population projections in 2050 give :

1. Chinese (Mandarin) : around 850m to 1300m depending on the local languages strength
2. Hindi (all dialects) : around 760m (if 42% of Indians rate is stable)
2. French : 715m (official prediction, but highly depends of literacy rates improvements in French-speaking Africa)
4. Spanish
5. English
6. Arab

Chinese will be strong but it is not competing against English for international language status, it is competing against occident as a whole, as it is far easier to occidentals to learn English than Mandarin. Occidentals are more populous than Chinese, so it will depend on other Asian countries to tend to learn English or Mandarin, I see them learning Mandarin because China is closer geographically and culturally, and English is an exotic language to them, they&#039;ve never been able to learn it correctly. This battle is kind of the telenovelas of the future years to come, passioning.

For Hind, I doubt it will match Mandarin, except if the 42% ratio of Hindi speakers in India goes up and becomes a real national language, which is far from that currently.

French may be big, it is currently the second most important language in the world in terms of culture (second Wikipedia in terms of content after English) and most learned language in the world after English, but its growth depends heavily on Africa&#039;s development, and in 2050 will Africa be fully developped ? I&#039;m not sure..

English : should grow demographically and economically, but less than the rest of the world, English domination reached its peak and never go up again.

Spanish has the potential to beat English, but it could take too long before Mandarin takes the lead.

Arab... hum, I still don&#039;t know if we can consider it as a language or several languages/dialects. Its wiki stats are currently under the other major languages (2.5 less users than French or German, and 2.8 less traffic than Portuguese), but it the language that has the best growth rate with Russian... So, that&#039;s a mistery too me if the Arabic langue will be important or not.

German : demography will be weak and they don&#039;t have colonies, so I don&#039;t think German will ever be important again, even if currently they&#039;re reputed (industry).

Same for Russian, Portuguese, Japanese, Korean and Italian...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Population projections in 2050 give :</p>
<p>1. Chinese (Mandarin) : around 850m to 1300m depending on the local languages strength<br />
2. Hindi (all dialects) : around 760m (if 42% of Indians rate is stable)<br />
2. French : 715m (official prediction, but highly depends of literacy rates improvements in French-speaking Africa)<br />
4. Spanish<br />
5. English<br />
6. Arab</p>
<p>Chinese will be strong but it is not competing against English for international language status, it is competing against occident as a whole, as it is far easier to occidentals to learn English than Mandarin. Occidentals are more populous than Chinese, so it will depend on other Asian countries to tend to learn English or Mandarin, I see them learning Mandarin because China is closer geographically and culturally, and English is an exotic language to them, they&#8217;ve never been able to learn it correctly. This battle is kind of the telenovelas of the future years to come, passioning.</p>
<p>For Hind, I doubt it will match Mandarin, except if the 42% ratio of Hindi speakers in India goes up and becomes a real national language, which is far from that currently.</p>
<p>French may be big, it is currently the second most important language in the world in terms of culture (second Wikipedia in terms of content after English) and most learned language in the world after English, but its growth depends heavily on Africa&#8217;s development, and in 2050 will Africa be fully developped ? I&#8217;m not sure..</p>
<p>English : should grow demographically and economically, but less than the rest of the world, English domination reached its peak and never go up again.</p>
<p>Spanish has the potential to beat English, but it could take too long before Mandarin takes the lead.</p>
<p>Arab&#8230; hum, I still don&#8217;t know if we can consider it as a language or several languages/dialects. Its wiki stats are currently under the other major languages (2.5 less users than French or German, and 2.8 less traffic than Portuguese), but it the language that has the best growth rate with Russian&#8230; So, that&#8217;s a mistery too me if the Arabic langue will be important or not.</p>
<p>German : demography will be weak and they don&#8217;t have colonies, so I don&#8217;t think German will ever be important again, even if currently they&#8217;re reputed (industry).</p>
<p>Same for Russian, Portuguese, Japanese, Korean and Italian&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Goldlist Method by Victor Berrjod</title>
		<link>http://huliganov.tv/goldlist-eu/comment-page-1/#comment-15907</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Victor Berrjod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huliganov.tv/#comment-15907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That sounds like what I&#039;ve been doing for the characters too, especially number 4. Sometimes I almost shake my head as I write them in, because I think I&#039;m never going to remember that one anyway, but then there are times when I remove a whole line that I was shaking my head at two weeks before.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds like what I&#8217;ve been doing for the characters too, especially number 4. Sometimes I almost shake my head as I write them in, because I think I&#8217;m never going to remember that one anyway, but then there are times when I remove a whole line that I was shaking my head at two weeks before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Goldlist Method by Viktor D. Huliganov</title>
		<link>http://huliganov.tv/goldlist-eu/comment-page-1/#comment-15905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Viktor D. Huliganov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://huliganov.tv/#comment-15905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t uncombine them, but what I tend to do is one of the following four things

1. If the combining has helped me learn the whole thing, then the whole thing is distilled out
2. If the combining has helped me learn one part but not the other, then I distill the part which I did know and see if I can recombine rest with another word or group.
3. If the combining hasn&#039;t helped me learn yet and there are other recombinations available, I might swap elements between combinations
4. Or if the combining didn&#039;t help but there are no other swap options, then I keep it in and hope another writing of it will stick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t uncombine them, but what I tend to do is one of the following four things</p>
<p>1. If the combining has helped me learn the whole thing, then the whole thing is distilled out<br />
2. If the combining has helped me learn one part but not the other, then I distill the part which I did know and see if I can recombine rest with another word or group.<br />
3. If the combining hasn&#8217;t helped me learn yet and there are other recombinations available, I might swap elements between combinations<br />
4. Or if the combining didn&#8217;t help but there are no other swap options, then I keep it in and hope another writing of it will stick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
