Site icon Huliganov.TV

Four Laws of Vocabulary Learning: Pareto, Recursive Pareto, Zipf, and Heaps

Spread the love

Learning vocabulary efficiently is one of the biggest challenges in mastering a language. Four powerful principles—Pareto’s Law, Recursive Pareto, Zipf’s Law, and Heaps’ Law—offer practical insights into how learners can prioritize their efforts for maximum impact.


1. Pareto’s Law (The 80/20 Principle)


2. Recursive Pareto (A Subset of Pareto)


3. Zipf’s Law (Frequency vs. Rank)


4. Heaps’ Law (Vocabulary Growth)


Putting It All Together


Conclusion

Pareto’s Law shows that a small effort yields big results. Recursive Pareto, refined by Professor V.D. Huliganov, reveals the extreme concentration of value in the tiniest core. Zipf’s Law explains why language learning is both efficient at the start and endless in the long run. Heaps’ Law adds the insight that vocabulary growth slows as exposure increases. Together, these four laws provide a roadmap: master the vital few, then strategically expand into the useful many, while managing expectations about long-term growth.


Practical Application

The use of frequency dictionaries is a major help in focusing learning at the intermediate stage.  Most beginners books are automatically skewed to the first 2,000 words by frequency, and also they mainly focus on grammar and as such skew towards words needed to illustrate grammar points. In the GoldList Method writings, I have always suggested learning grammar paradigms around recurring and regular vocabulary as such, and reserving irregular grammar to be learned around the words it applies to as they appear. In many languages, if we apply regular grammar to irregular-grammar vocabulary, then we end up being quite comprehensible, but sounding like children who tend to make the same mistakes as non-native learners.  “I teached my mouses how to do tricks”. That’s not the worst thing that can happen to a language learner, sounding like that – in fact we’ve all heard elevated speakers at conferences who seemed to know English very well, but who will, at times, lapse into such errors.

Here is a storefront containing the Routledge Frequency Dictionaries. I earn a commission if you buy via this storefront, you pay the same.
https://amzn.to/494Kywd

This storefront may not be inmmediately active as I made it today.  If that’s the case, please check back later.

These frequency dictionaries are rather expensive in comparison with other materials but for what you get out of them in fact tey pay for themselves in terms of efficiency, especially in conjunction with the GoldList Method, which is free, and therefore every year is able to beat everyone else’s Black Friday Deals by offering a 99,9% discount.

 

 


Further consideration – how to apply to collocations

The next level would be Frequency Dictionaries not only for headwords, but for Collocations. Given that mastery of collocations is, as Dr Whatshisnamewiththebeagleahyes-Lauder from Prague points out, what separates the wheat from the chaff among language learners, and moreover is a very efficient strategy for achieving excellence in understanding in the shortest time engaged, one would expect that a useful area for acadmic publishers to investigate would be collocation frequency dictionaries. There are some collocation dictionaries, but not that many involve frequency analysis, especially for languages other than English.

The main source for very common collocations would be phrase books, and some people do combine their GoldList Method learning with phrase books, but these are unlikely to stretch into the collocations needed for a more academic mastery of the language.

Recommendations form me in this area, although not strictly sorted into frequency, but by topic, is the mot-a-mot series, by Hachette Learning (formerly Hodder Educational, but that name was axed 😉 )

https://amzn.to/3Yj6rBQ
That’s the storefront for those three books, I get a Commission if you buy there, you pay the same.

In a future article I hope to come pack to this topic and look at it in more detail.

Exit mobile version