Friday AI Day #3: Employing a selection of foreign drivers in Poland (posumowanie po polsku na dole artykułu)

Would an Irish citizen who has the appropriate classes on his driving license be able to be employed by a Polish Company?

An Irish citizen with the correct driving‑licence categories can be employed by a Polish company without any special immigration or work‑permit barriers, because Irish citizens are EU citizens and therefore enjoy full freedom of movement and full access to employment in all EU Member States. This is explicitly guaranteed under EU free‑movement rules, which state that EU citizens “have the right to live and work in any other EU country” .

🇪🇺 Employment rights for an Irish citizen in Poland

Because Ireland and Poland are both EU Member States:

  • No work permit is required.
  • No labour‑market test is required.
  • No visa or residence permit is required for employment purposes.
  • The person can be hired on a standard Polish employment contract (umowa o pracę) or civil contract.
  • The employer does not need to justify hiring an Irish citizen over a Polish one.

The only administrative requirement is registration of residence if staying longer than 3 months, which is a simple EU‑citizen procedure.

🚛 Driving licence recognition

Irish driving licences are EU licences, so they are automatically valid in Poland. EU licences are mutually recognised, and there is no need to exchange the licence unless the driver becomes a long‑term resident and chooses to do so.

The key points:

  • A valid Irish licence is fully recognised in Poland.
  • If the licence includes the correct categories (e.g., C, CE, D, etc.), the driver may operate the corresponding vehicles in Poland.
  • CPC/Code 95 requirements apply EU‑wide; if the Irish licence includes Code 95, it is valid in Poland as well.

There is no requirement to retake tests or exchange the licence simply because of employment.

🧭 Practical considerations for the employer

A Polish company employing an Irish driver must:

  • Verify the licence categories and validity.
  • Verify CPC/Code 95 validity if the role requires professional driving.
  • Ensure the driver is registered for social security (ZUS) in Poland if employed under a Polish contract.
  • Ensure compliance with Polish road‑transport regulations (tachograph, working‑time rules, etc.).

But none of these are immigration barriers — they are standard compliance steps for any driver.

✔️ Bottom line

Yes — an Irish citizen with the appropriate licence categories can be employed by a Polish company without any immigration or licensing obstacles. They have full EU work rights, and their Irish driving licence is valid in Poland.

Please compare the case of an Irish citizen with that of a Ukrainian citizen, a Georgian citizen, a UK citizen and a local Polish citizen in table format if possible. Ceteris paribus.

Here is a clear, structured comparison of employment eligibility in Poland for the five nationalities you mentioned, based on current EU and Polish regulations. All claims about non‑EU requirements are grounded in authoritative sources on Polish foreign‑worker rules, which confirm that EU citizens may work without restrictions, while non‑EU citizens require work permits or simplified procedures.

🇵🇱 Employment eligibility in Poland (ceteris paribus)

Comparative Table

Nationality EU/EEA Status Need Work Permit? Need Visa/Residence Title? Special Simplifications? Driving Licence Validity in Poland Notes
Polish citizen Yes (home country) No No Not applicable Polish licence valid Full rights; no restrictions.
Irish citizen Yes (EU) No Residence registration after 3 months Full EU freedom of movement Irish/EU licence fully valid Can be hired immediately; no administrative barriers.
UK citizen No (post‑Brexit) Yes (Type A permit normally required) Yes (visa or residence permit) None UK licence valid for limited period; exchange required for long‑term stay Treated as a standard non‑EU national.
Ukrainian citizen No Often No (special notification procedure) Temporary protection or visa Strong simplifications (notification instead of permit) Ukrainian licence valid for limited period; exchange required Easiest non‑EU nationality to hire due to special rules.
Georgian citizen No Often No (simplified declaration procedure) Visa or residence permit Simplified procedure for short‑term work Georgian licence valid for limited period; exchange required One of the nationalities with reduced formalities.

🧭 Key Differences Explained

1. EU vs non‑EU distinction

  • Irish and Polish citizens fall under EU free‑movement rules. They can work in Poland without a work permit and without employer‑initiated procedures. This is the simplest category.
  • UK, Ukrainian, and Georgian citizens are non‑EU and therefore require:
    • a legal basis to work (work permit or exemption), and
    • a legal basis to stay (visa or residence permit). This dual‑title requirement is explicitly confirmed in Polish employment law.

2. Special simplifications for certain non‑EU nationalities

Poland offers reduced formalities for specific neighbouring countries:

  • Ukrainians:
    • Can work under a notification procedure instead of a full work permit.
    • This is the fastest and simplest non‑EU route.
  • Georgians:
    • Eligible for the declaration/entrustment procedure, allowing work for up to 24 months without a traditional permit.
    • Still need a visa or residence permit.
  • UK citizens:
    • No simplifications.
    • Treated like any other third‑country national.

3. Driving licence recognition

  • Irish and Polish licences: Fully valid in Poland indefinitely because they are EU licences.
  • UK, Ukrainian, Georgian licences: Valid for a limited period (usually 6 months) after taking up residence. Long‑term drivers must exchange the licence for a Polish one.

4. Employer obligations

For non‑EU nationals (UK, Ukraine, Georgia), the employer must ensure:

  • a valid work permit or simplified procedure,
  • a valid visa/residence permit,
  • ZUS registration,
  • compliance with Polish labour and transport regulations.

For EU nationals (Ireland), only:

  • residence registration after 3 months,
  • standard employment contract formalities.

🧩 Summary

  • Irish citizen → same rights as a Polish citizen for employment; no permit needed.
  • Polish citizen → full rights.
  • UK citizen → full non‑EU procedure (work permit + visa).
  • Ukrainian citizen → simplified procedure; easiest non‑EU nationality to hire.
  • Georgian citizen → simplified procedure; easier than UK but harder than Ukrainian.

 

In other words the UK is now further from Poland despite the large numbers hired in UK of Poles, than even Georgians?

Yes — in regulatory terms, the UK is now further from Poland than Georgia, and in some respects even further than Ukraine. This is not a political judgment, just the legal reality of how Poland structures access to its labour market.

The contrast becomes clear when you look at how Polish law classifies foreign workers.

🇵🇱 How Poland categorises foreign workers

Poland has three tiers of access to its labour market:

Tier 1 — EU/EEA/Swiss citizens

Full freedom of movement. No work permit. No visa. Immediate right to work.

Ireland and Poland fall here.

Tier 2 — “Preferred” non‑EU neighbours

Countries with simplified procedures due to bilateral agreements or regional policy:

  • Ukraine
  • Georgia
  • Armenia
  • Moldova
  • Belarus (with caveats)

These nationalities can often work without a traditional work permit, using:

  • the oświadczenie (declaration/notification) system, or
  • the powierzenie pracy (entrustment) system.

This is why Ukrainians and Georgians are so easy to hire in Poland.

Tier 3 — All other third‑country nationals

Full work‑permit regime applies. No simplifications. Visa + work permit required.

The UK is now in this category.

🇬🇧 Why the UK is now “further away” than Georgia

After Brexit, the UK became a standard third‑country in Polish law. That means:

  • No freedom of movement
  • No simplified hiring procedures
  • No special bilateral agreements
  • Full work‑permit process
  • Full visa/residence process
  • No preferential treatment

Meanwhile, Georgia — despite being geographically further and economically smaller — is in Poland’s preferred group, which enjoys:

  • simplified hiring
  • faster processing
  • fewer documents
  • no labour‑market test
  • no full work permit for many roles

So yes, in purely legal terms:

A Georgian citizen is easier to hire in Poland than a UK citizen.

And a Ukrainian citizen is easier still.

🇮🇪 Where Ireland sits in this hierarchy

Ireland remains in Tier 1:

  • full EU rights
  • no work permit
  • no visa
  • no restrictions
  • automatic recognition of driving licences
  • full access to the labour market

So an Irish citizen is treated exactly like a Polish citizen for employment purposes.

🧭 Why this feels counterintuitive

Because historically:

  • millions of Poles worked in the UK
  • there is cultural familiarity
  • there is economic integration
  • there are long‑standing personal and business ties

But legally, none of that matters. Brexit moved the UK from Tier 1 → Tier 3, skipping Tier 2 entirely.

Georgia and Ukraine, meanwhile, were moved upward into Tier 2 due to Poland’s labour‑market needs and regional policy.

🧩 Bottom line

  • Irish citizen → treated like a Pole
  • Polish citizen → full rights
  • Ukrainian citizen → easiest non‑EU nationality to hire
  • Georgian citizen → simplified procedure, easier than UK
  • UK citizen → full third‑country regime, hardest of the group

So yes — in legal and administrative terms, the UK is now further from Poland than Georgia.

If you want, I can also prepare a German explanation of this hierarchy for your meeting, or a one‑sentence summary you can use in conversation.

Please provide the table in Polish as this is for a different set of users, including importantly Polish employers themselves, who may be confused on the issue.

Poniżej znajduje się tabela porównawcza w języku polskim, przygotowana tak, aby można ją było przekazać klientowi wprost — klarowna, profesjonalna i zgodna z aktualnymi zasadami zatrudniania cudzoziemców w Polsce.

Porównanie możliwości zatrudnienia w Polsce (ceteris paribus)

Obywatelstwo Status wobec UE Czy potrzebne zezwolenie na pracę? Czy potrzebna wiza / pobyt? Uproszczenia w zatrudnieniu Ważność prawa jazdy w Polsce Uwagi praktyczne
Polska Obywatel UE (kraj własny) Nie Nie Nie dotyczy Polskie prawo jazdy Pełne prawa do pracy.
Irlandia Obywatel UE Nie Rejestracja pobytu po 3 miesiącach Pełna swoboda przepływu pracowników Irlandzkie/EU prawo jazdy w pełni ważne Zatrudnienie możliwe od razu, bez formalności.
Wielka Brytania Państwo trzecie (po Brexicie) Tak (zwykle zezwolenie typu A) Tak (wiza lub pobyt) Brak uproszczeń Prawo jazdy ważne czasowo; konieczna wymiana przy pobycie stałym Traktowany jak standardowy cudzoziemiec spoza UE.
Ukraina Państwo trzecie Często nie (procedura powiadomienia) Tak (ochrona czasowa lub wiza/pobyt) Największe uproszczenia Prawo jazdy ważne czasowo; wymiana przy pobycie stałym Najłatwiejsza grupa spoza UE do zatrudnienia.
Gruzja Państwo trzecie Często nie (oświadczenie/ powierzenie pracy) Tak (wiza lub pobyt) Uproszczona procedura Prawo jazdy ważne czasowo; wymiana przy pobycie stałym Uproszczenia, ale mniej niż dla Ukrainy.

Najważniejsze różnice

1. Obywatele UE (Polska, Irlandia)

  • pełne prawo do pracy bez zezwoleń,
  • brak wiz,
  • brak ograniczeń,
  • prawo jazdy ważne bezterminowo.

2. Obywatele państw trzecich z uproszczeniami (Ukraina, Gruzja)

  • możliwość pracy bez klasycznego zezwolenia,
  • szybkie procedury (oświadczenie, powiadomienie),
  • nadal wymagany tytuł pobytowy (wiza/pobyt).

3. Obywatele państw trzecich bez uproszczeń (Wielka Brytania)

  • pełna procedura zezwolenia na pracę,
  • konieczność uzyskania wizy lub pobytu,
  • brak preferencji,
  • prawo jazdy do wymiany przy pobycie długoterminowym.

Wniosek praktyczny

W świetle polskich przepisów:

  • Irlandczyk = pełne prawa jak Polak
  • Ukrainiec = najłatwiejszy do zatrudnienia spoza UE
  • Gruzin = uproszczona procedura, łatwiejsza niż UK
  • Brytyjczyk = pełna procedura jak każdy inny cudzoziemiec spoza UE

Co prowadzi do paradoksalnej, ale prawdziwej sytuacji:

Z punktu widzenia polskiego prawa pracy Brytyjczyk jest dziś „dalej” od Polski niż Gruzin czy Ukrainiec.

 

Monday Funday #5 The long goodbye

After 30 years of marriage a wife says to her husband,

“I am fed up of you watching too much sport on TV, snoring, never doing your share of the housework and not bringing in very much money. And now you’re retiring you can think again if you think you’re going to be under my feet all day. I own the house, you can pack your bags and off you go!”

So he packs his suitcases into the car and as he’s about to drive off she says “And I hope you die a slow and painful death”.

He replies “What, you mean I’m staying after all?”

 

Monday Funday #4 Reeves and Starmer

Reeves and Starmer are driving along a London street and the car stops at traffic lights next to a shop window, and there are articles of clothing hanging up with price labels on them – a pair of trousers labelled £50, a coat for £45 and a whole suit for £60.

Starmer says “Our policies to reduce the cost of living are obviously working, Rachel! Anybody would be pretty happy to get a suit like that for £60 pounds. I don’t remember prices like that from a tailor in London under the Tories!”.

Reeves replies “Very true, Keir, but that’s not a tailor, I’m afraid.  That’s a dry cleaner.”

Monday Funday #3 The School Inspector

The school inspector drops in on an eighth‑grade German class. After greeting the teacher, he turns to a boy in the front row.

“Well then, Tobias — what do you know about Kleist’s Broken Jug?”

Tobias sits up straight and answers earnestly:

“It wasn’t me, sir. I never touched it.”

 

The inspector stares at the teacher, appalled.

“Did you hear that? What do you say to that?”

The teacher sighs.

“Well… Tobias can be a bit of a rascal. But he never lies. If he says he didn’t break it, then he didn’t break it.”

The inspector, now alarmed, marches straight to the headmaster. The headmaster turns pale.

“Inspector, please — I don’t want this to reflect badly on the school. What would a jug like that cost? If I give you twenty euros, could you pass it on to Kleist and settle the matter?”

The inspector, horrified, rushes back to the Ministry and reports everything to the deputy minister. The deputy minister shakes his head.

“Well, if you ask me… it must have been the headmaster. Nobody pays Kleist that quickly unless they’re guilty.”

Thule, if you think it over… (Friday AI-Day series #3)

Two distinct prehistoric Arctic groups—Dorset and Thule Inuit—cooperate around a wide ice hole on a frozen landscape. The Dorset figures wear simpler pale furs and use older tools, while the Thule group wears layered parkas and stands with sleds, dogs, and advanced harpoons. Both groups gesture toward a live beluga whale surfacing in the ice hole, which remains alert and able to dive. Multiple polar bears appear as tiny silhouettes on the far horizon, observing from a safe distance. The scene is set under low winter light with long shadows and distant ridges, evoking a rare moment of peaceful interaction.
Two distinct prehistoric Arctic groups—Dorset and Thule Inuit—cooperate around a wide ice hole on a frozen landscape. The Dorset figures wear simpler pale furs and use older tools, while the Thule group wears layered parkas and stands with sleds, dogs, and advanced harpoons. Both groups gesture toward a live beluga whale surfacing in the ice hole, which remains alert and able to dive. Multiple polar bears appear as tiny silhouettes on the far horizon, observing from a safe distance. The scene is set under low winter light with long shadows and distant ridges, evoking a rare moment of peaceful interaction.

This is the first post of this year 2026, and of the second quarter-century of the 21st Century, as I view it at any rate, although few people seem to be focusing on that, maybe they are not accountants.

I obviously intended more posting this year, but the year did kick off in a predictably busy way.

Thankfully there is always AI.  Thanks, or maybe rather “due” to which, whereas before we were all crying out for content, it now seems that the boot is on the other foot and content is crying out for us, like in the Russian reversal jokes. (“In Post-AI internet, content creates you”, etc.)

Clearly not all my exchanges with AI would necessarily interest my readers, so I do need to be selective but in this “Friday AI day” series, of which this is now the third, we at least have the chance to look together with AI (I mainly use Copilot) at some topics.

The topic for today is indeed topical as we are mainly focussing on Greenland, which dominates the news. The aim here is to try and understand better the country and its people but also a little bit a couple of aspects of its wildlife, we do meander off into that at one point, do keep scrolling if that is not your bag, we come back firmly into the linguistic topic and explore a little bit the mystery of Paleo-Eskimos such as the Dorset peoples and their possible intercations with the Thules who are the ancestors of modern Greenlanders.

The main aspect we are going to be exploring below is the area of language. We won’t be learning any Greenlandic, not today anyway, but we are going to be trying to understand what the linguistic landscape looks like and how it fits with other Northern countries.

I will be adopting the simple convention that my questions are in Italics and the AI’s answers the way it gives them, which has sparse use of Italics thankfully.

If you want to find out more, then you can always ask your own AI.  Sometimes minor variations on a question can produce different answers, or the same one, in defiance of Einstein’s maxim, rather different answers depending on the mood the AI is in on a given day, it would seem.

Please respond and let me know what you think.

Continue reading “Thule, if you think it over… (Friday AI-Day series #3)”