The Greatest Show on Earth – too right!


One of my strange habits is that I don’t tend to walk around with the book I’m reading – I would be more likely to go somewhere with my goldlist book and my podcast player – but I do read a lot. I obviously read a lot on-screen, as does everyone in the internet, but this reading is a bit like the finger buffets where people are bringing you little bits of food all the time, and for people like me who need to control their intake it’s a nightmare, as you soon lose count. Whereas on the other hand sitting down to a plate meal where you can see what there is, that’s a bit like reading books. And I do a lot of that as well. Books … and plate meals also, as you can readily imagine.

Instead of taking the book with me, though, I have different books all parked in different places. I have one in one toilet, one in another toilet, one in the car to read when waiting for my wife to go into some shop, some at the Prague flat, some at the office, etc. Right now at my Prague flat I am reading the third book of Mr Germy Claxon, who is gradually becoming in the third book a bit boring and repetitive, which is something I’ll obviously have to watch out for if I intend to do any amount of writing. And also I’m reading Professor Richard Dawkins’ latest offering, “The Greatest Show on Earth”.

Some people may rub their hands in glee at the idea of a creationist finally reading Dawkins and getting some sense put in his head. Sorry to disappoint you, but I’ve read a good deal of the “best” evolutionists’ literature, including Dennett, Dawkins, Darwin himself, and the talk.origins FAQ finger buffet, to the degree that it is becoming, a bit like Germy Claxon himself, a bit predictable and repetitive.

Too right! But not the way he makes out...

Dawkins claims that in his new book (by the way he even gives this as his ‘raison d’etre’ for the book, like anybody ever needed an excuse to make a load of money) that he would put together the proof for evolution and finally put to bed the idea that there is any scientific doubt about it.

OK, so I started reading it in the hope that he will be successful. If he could prove it, it would change my worldview radically, of course, but I like to think I’m not so stupid as to go against something which is proven by what I understand to be scientific empiricism. Colour me disappointed then, but not in the least surprised, as I advance through the pages of this sizeable tome, to be confronted with, instead of any proof (and remember just one objective proof-in-total will do) a very long argument based more on rhetoric than on objective logic, which he calls “a softening up” procedure. He describes once again the ideas of evolutionists intertwining them with observations from Nature, some of them very well observed and well written, but all of which have more than one way of interpreting them, and he ignores the interpretations that a Creationist might give and links them in instead to his developing argument. This is a fine, readable work of interpreting a bunch of Natural History observations so that they fit one framework. It still doesn’t contain one single proof. If it did, it wouldn’t need to be so long and involved. Effectively, like so much other popular science literature, it is an exercise in making you think that they know things about how we got here which remain their faith-based mere conjecture.

Let’s face it, recently we had the 200th Anniversary of Darwin’s opus “On The Origin Of Species”, which led the press to dredge up such interesting facts on the incomplete success of evolutionist ideas as that most people on Earth still believe in some form of Creator, and where are the ideas of Creationism held most strongly? In the world’s most advanced country and most powerful economy, the United States. This is not a result of people being sheltered in Bedouin huts from the progress of science – this is a result of “science falsely so-called”, as the scripture identifies certain thinking, being unable to furnish adequate proofs to convince even the more sophisticated populations that it is anything more than an alternative system built on as much faith and wishful thinking in the final analysis as our religious one is.

And it has always been my view that in the end it depends on what you wish to believe. If you wish to believe that there isn’t a God, if you wish there were no God, then naturally you will allow yourself to be persuaded by these long books which in the end all go around in circles and prove nothing. If you wish to believe there is a God, then you can read anything that the humanist press have got to throw at you and you’ll find it quite faith-confirmatory to see that the thing the atheists believe has unanswered questions that you could drive a truck through.

Let’s be clear – people who think that they can “prove” evolution are as misguided as people who think they can “prove” creationism, so-called creation scientists, who are, basically, Christians and Muslims who need some kind of empirical prop when they ought to know better. God patently hasn’t ordered this world so that either side can find true proofs of their convictions. He has clearly ordered this world to give you the possibility to believe what you choose, even in the face of a convincing alternative. In so many areas we have a problem with freedom of will. We want to be good but the flesh stops us, we want to do this and do that but we have to contend with the world, the flesh and the devil, but at least in one area we should, every one of us, consider ourselves free, and that is to select whether we choose to believe in God as Creator and Redeemer, or some faceless algorithm that sees no sins and offers no redemption. You make that choice in your heart and mind, regardless of whether you are “good enough” to believe it. Forget about that. All God wants is for you to choose to believe Him, the main recurrent theme of the Bible, and especially the Gospels. He is perfectly able to do the rest, and did do it, on Calvary.

Artist Michael Godard's vision of Calvary - available at http://www.artcentergallery.com

In some cases Richard Dawkins argues very well for things which I as a Creationist believe in and he actually strengthened my arguments, rather than destroyed it. So much for the Evolutionists thinking that we only don’t believe their guff because we won’t read it, we want to be sheltered from it, and we do read it, we are too stupid to understand it. He shows, for example, in an early part of the book how fast selection can lead to speciation, and it turns out this is a good deal quicker than science has in the past believed.  The origin of the silver fox is a great illustration drawn by Dawkins for this point. This is a great argument in favour of my view that an awful lot of speciation has indeed taken place since the Flood, only without additional genes being added – these speciations have basically been attenuations of the genetic variation that was intrinsic to created animals in the first place. This is why we have many more species today, despite extinctions, than could possibly have fitted into the Ark, and yet the Ark account given in the first Book of Moses is, in my view, authoritative history.

If both systems, creationism and evolution, in the end boil down to what you believe, and not proof, then of the two I prefer the one which predicts a world in which you need to take things on faith, namely the Christian model, rather than the one which anticipates that we will find answers to everything by science, which is the so-called “rationalist” model which favours evolution. What we actually see, ie, that neither side knows the answer and can only believe, is consistent with much Christian philosophy, but undermines the premises of rationalism entirely, which is based on the idea that we only accept empirical proof, making the presumption that things which we are to accept and understand are susceptible to such empirical proof. Religious texts tell us straight that they are not susceptible, and that, in the words of Christ, we may not “put the Lord our God to the test”. Empiricism is entirely about testing, by its very definition. Therefore Christ dismisses empiricism, which should embolden any Christian to question the rationalists’ approach to science, in which they seem to promise that sight proofs will be forthcoming. Christ made this world, and He did not make a world that was going to answer empiricists’ questions. He made a world in which every single scientific discovery actually raises more questions that it answers: questions whose answers we will fully know in the promised resurrected eternity.

Prof. Dawkins looks like an awfully nice chap, but he denies there is any good in the capacity for faith, and in doing so ends up with an imbalanced view of the world.

There is too much bluff and show in “the Greatest Show on Earth”.  In fact, that’s pretty much a summary of what it is. It certainly contains fascinating facts, beautiful writing, great photography and images, but in the end it is true that Evolutionism is the greatest show on earth. It is a show, and not reality. So thank you for admitting it.

Rounding off for aesthetics’ (please note – not “atheistics”) sake with the same analogy I came in on, I will say that Dawkin’s book is a large plate of tasty food, but it is comfort food. It is not a balanced diet. You need protein, carbohydrates, fats, roughage, vitamins, minerals and water all in balance. To get a proper world view you need to use your faculties, you faculties for both rational an logical thought and onference from objective observation on the one hand, and your capacity for faith in what is revealed that you cannot have proven, on the other. That is a balance that Dawkins seems to have lost. I’m not getting my mental five-a-day from his latest book, just a re-hash of the same old arguments claiming to be what they’re not. It is a plate of philosophical bubble and squeak, with the odd reheated bit of sausage turning up in it – but a far cry from the greatest meal on Earth. There’s another Book that lays claim to that, and it tells us far more about the Origin than modern science can.

About David J. James

52 year old accountant who loves languages, literature, history, religion, politics, internet, vlogging and blogging and lively written discussion. Conservative Christian, married to an angel, we have three kids, and live in Warsaw, Poland. I can help you with company set-up, bookkeeping, payroll, tax, audit and due diligence all over Poland and the region.

Posted on 22/11/2009, in Blog only, Religion and Philosophy, Uncle Davey's Natural Selection and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.

  1. I was more than happy to search out this web-site.I needed to thanks in your time for this wonderful read!! I definitely enjoying each little little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you blog post.

    Can I simply say what a aid to seek out someone who actually is aware of what theyre talking about on the internet. You definitely know easy methods to bring a difficulty to mild and make it important. More people need to learn this and perceive this facet of the story. I cant consider youre no more fashionable because you undoubtedly have the gift.
    very nice post, i actually love this website, keep on it

    It?s arduous to seek out knowledgeable individuals on this topic, however you sound like you realize what you?re talking about! Thanks
    It is best to participate in a contest for the most effective blogs on the web. I will suggest this website!

    An attention-grabbing discussion is price comment. I believe that it\’s best to write more on this subject, it might not be a taboo topic but usually individuals are not sufficient to talk on such topics. To the next. Cheers

    Howdy! I just wish to give an enormous thumbs up for the good info you could have right here on this post. I can be coming again to your weblog for extra soon.

    This actually answered my drawback, thanks!
    There are some fascinating closing dates on this article however I don?t know if I see all of them heart to heart. There\’s some validity however I will take hold opinion till I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we wish extra! Added to FeedBurner as properly
    you\’ve got a fantastic blog right here! would you wish to make some invite posts on my blog?
    Once I initially commented I clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now every time a remark is added I get 4 emails with the identical comment. Is there any means you\’ll be able to remove me from that service? Thanks!
    The following time I read a weblog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as a lot as this one. I imply, I know it was my option to read, but I really thought youd have one thing attention-grabbing to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about one thing that you can fix if you werent too busy on the lookout for attention.
    Spot on with this write-up, I actually suppose this web site wants much more consideration. I?ll most likely be once more to learn far more, thanks for that info.
    Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive learn something like this before. So good to find any person with some authentic thoughts on this subject. realy thank you for beginning this up. this website is one thing that\’s needed on the net, someone with a little originality. helpful job for bringing something new to the internet!
    I?d have to check with you here. Which isn\’t one thing I normally do! I get pleasure from reading a post that may make folks think. Also, thanks for allowing me to comment!
    That is the right weblog for anyone who desires to search out out about this topic. You understand a lot its almost exhausting to argue with you (not that I truly would want?HaHa). You positively put a brand new spin on a subject thats been written about for years. Nice stuff, simply nice!
    Aw, this was a very nice post. In idea I wish to put in writing like this additionally ? taking time and precise effort to make a very good article? however what can I say? I procrastinate alot and by no means seem to get something done.
    I?m impressed, I must say. Really hardly ever do I encounter a weblog that?s both educative and entertaining, and let me tell you, you have got hit the nail on the head. Your idea is outstanding; the difficulty is one thing that not enough individuals are speaking intelligently about. I\’m very comfortable that I stumbled throughout this in my search for something regarding this.
    Oh my goodness! an incredible article dude. Thanks Nonetheless I\’m experiencing concern with ur rss . Don?t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting identical rss downside? Anybody who knows kindly respond. Thnkx
    WONDERFUL Post.thanks for share..more wait .. ?
    There are actually plenty of particulars like that to take into consideration. That may be a great point to convey up. I supply the thoughts above as basic inspiration but clearly there are questions like the one you convey up the place a very powerful factor will probably be working in honest good faith. I don?t know if best practices have emerged around things like that, but I am certain that your job is clearly identified as a good game. Each boys and girls feel the affect of just a moment?s pleasure, for the rest of their lives.
    An impressive share, I simply given this onto a colleague who was doing a bit of analysis on this. And he in actual fact bought me breakfast as a result of I discovered it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the deal with! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to debate this, I feel strongly about it and love reading extra on this topic. If possible, as you turn out to be experience, would you mind updating your blog with extra particulars? It\’s highly helpful for me. Massive thumb up for this weblog publish!
    After research just a few of the blog posts in your website now, and I really like your means of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark website record and can be checking back soon. Pls check out my website as well and let me know what you think.
    Your place is valueble for me. Thanks!?
    This web site is really a walk-through for all the info you needed about this and didn?t know who to ask. Glimpse right here, and you?ll definitely uncover it.
    There\’s noticeably a bundle to find out about this. I assume you made certain good points in options also.
    You made some first rate points there. I regarded on the web for the problem and found most individuals will go together with with your website.
    Would you be serious about exchanging hyperlinks?
    Good post. I learn something more difficult on totally different blogs everyday. It\’s going to at all times be stimulating to learn content from other writers and apply somewhat one thing from their store. I?d prefer to make use of some with the content on my blog whether or not you don?t mind. Natually I?ll give you a link on your net blog. Thanks for sharing.
    I discovered your weblog website on google and examine a few of your early posts. Proceed to keep up the very good operate. I simply additional up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Seeking ahead to studying more from you afterward!?
    I\’m typically to blogging and i really admire your content. The article has actually peaks my interest. I am going to bookmark your web site and preserve checking for brand spanking new information.

    Like

Your thoughts:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: