Eight top tips for when it’s hard to finish a book.

If someone has difficulty with finishing a novel, or any written work for that matter, could be an epic poem, plays of Shakespeare, etc, then here are eight helpful hints.

1. Try listening to the same on Audible. The voice actor may carry what our attention span cannot. In my experience a good voice actor adds an additional level on top of the work which can help our enjoyment nd understanding of the piece. Conversely a poor voice actor can do the opposite, so do check the reviews which are broken out into story and performance, and pay attention to what peers say about the performance. Also there is the opportunity to listen to a sample before purchasing any Audible title.

2. Take the book on holiday with you or leave it in a place (typically your bathroom) where you will be reminded on a regular (hopefully) basis to dip into it.

3. On that note, if a book is not lending itself to the binge read, see if instead it lends itself to the smaller chunks on a regular basis mode, in which case it is a typical bathroom classic.

4. On line look for groups around that author and compare notes, making it a social read can be an encouragement to finish.

5. There are also physical book clubs that one can find, join or start locally to read socially. Failing that, there’s Graham Norton’s Book Club podcast on Audible, now in its sixth series, with previous series available for download, so you can look through and see if the given book has already been discussed by the team.

6. One can sometimes find at second hand bookstores copies of the book that have been annotated by an earlier reader. This can also add a “social element” albeit one way. one can also consider making one’s own annotations on the text. Pencil ones are best practice. They actually add to the worth of the used book if well done. I am enjoying re-reading War and Peace in Russian and noting my own earlier annotations from when I was young and just learning the language. Nice memories emerge. And that one took a year to read back then and the last section is famously Tolstoy oing off on his own hobby-horse theories, but still I believe one should plod on. This time, I am re-reading with my wife and we are using Audible, which has a great reading in Russian and an even better one by Thandiwe Newton in English.

7. It is also helpful to watch derivatives from books such as “the film” but one should add a note of caution. The joy of one’s own reading is to imagine the character. Even when using Audible we still visualise the character. Once we have seen a film we are led in our visualisation. It’s not hard in the case of some series of books to notice how even the author in later works is influenced by the filmed versions of her (Diane, J.K., etc, yes sorry ladies but it does show, but I am sure Tolstoy would have had the same problem) earlier instalments.

8. Going from the sometimes ridiculous to the occasionally sublime, one can also read the entries in encyclopedias of literature and learned works on the author or even accompanying volumes to the work. In the case of Shakespeare I greatly prefer the New Cambridge series with its focus on performance history. One can look through back-issues of the Spectator to find old book reviews also.

I hope that these hints will help people attempt and finish more challenging literature. Not finishing a book is like not finishing a meal, ie. a bit of an insult to the chef. Sometimes one would like to hurl such an insult at a chef or an author, but I hope that is an exception rather than the general rule in our approach to any art form, food, literature or other.

For those who have read this article of mine to the end, I gratefully accept the mute compliment, although you are also welcome to make a non-mute compliment or insult for that matter in the comments. I mod for spammers and scammers, not for slammers.

Random post for your next read:

 

Should there be a mixing of Islam with other faiths?

I am not interested in mixing Christianity with Islam. Either they are right that Jesus is a man, or the Watchtower (who falsely claim to be “Jehovah’s Witnesses”) are right that He is the archangel Michael, or we Christians are right that He is “very God, begotten not created”, as the Adeste Fidelis terms it.

We cannot all be right. We could all be wrong and the nihilist view that He is mere legend might conceivably be true, though absurdly unlikely, but each grouping believes different things more than one of which cannot be true of Jesus at once.

Mixing Islam and Christianity would be possible if this were a secondary point, up for negotiation, but that is not the case, not for them and not for us.

So what I expect from Muslims is that they allow an open debate. They cannot expect to be able to preach to us about shirk and Allah not having partners and then put their fingers in their ears when e clarify that Jesus is not Allah’s partner, He IS Allah, to the extent that Allah mean the Creator God, rather than a specific view of God which only embraces the Father and ascribes to him none of the fatherly aspects that Christianity does.

If a Muslim comes here and wants to set out a dawah stall, I have good news and bad news. The good news is that I would grant them that liberty. The bad news is that I would only grant them that liberty on the basis of there existing similar liberties for Christians and others in his country of origin.

If a Muslim wants to build a Mosque, or attend a mosque which another Muslim built, fine. But only for nationals of places where I have the right to go unperturbed to an Evangelical church or a Catholic or Orthodox church with no barriers to building a thriving community in his place of origin.

I would not grant them any more rights than I would expect Christians to be granted in their countries. I would not expect them to arrange things so that Christians had reserved jobs in the food industry, for example, which is what the halal meat industry amounts to in the West for Muslims.  If there has to be only Muslims involved in the value chains and production flows of halal food, then in the spirit of our Consumer law which already exists in other areas, it should only be placed on offer publicly if labelled up that Christians and other non-Muslims have not been allowed to participate in the making of this product. In plain text, not with some foreign word that we don’t all understand, why should we?

In Poland there one law about which foreign Companies are allowed to set up branches in Poland without incorporating.  I was worried about UK Companies losing their Branch privileges on Brexit because at one time this privilege was only for EU Companies and those from one or two contracted countries. Now the rule extends to any country which allows the same privilege to Polish Companies in their economy. And that seems to work very well.

I think this “Gegenseitigkeitsprinzip”, to give it a posh German name the ichthyologist and explorer Harro Hieronimus once taught me, ought to be used a lot more often in society, in relations between people and businesses it’s self-evident, but needs to be made more evident in dealings between communities and countries.

Ten things to do for health (other than prayer and Bible study)

Here’s your 10 things that need to be done and best to do all of them:

  1. Intermittent fasting and sometimes longer fasting
  2. Keto (avoidance of carbs)
  3. Supplementation with broad range vitamins and minerals, especially going overboard on vits D and C
  4. Sufficient sleep every night.
  5. Metabolism improving foods rich in polyphenols and MCTs
  6. Anaerobic exercise such as weightlifting (recommend Starting Strength method)
  7. Aerobic exercise, such as 10,000 steps
  8. Portion Control, don’t eat too much even of what’s healthy – what you don’t eat is more important than what you do eat.
  9. Lay off the alcohol. It gets in the way of almost all the other points here as well as having risks of its own.
  10. Monitor progress regularly, both in terms of weight, and body shape, and ability to do more.

 

That’s the high level thing. Obviously it’s necessary to research into some of these a bit more to know what kinds of food or exercise are meant in each case, and Gundry’s books all contain lists of do foods and don’t foods.

I haven’t made a big deal out of saturated and non-saturated fats, what kind of casein is OK and why sheep and cgoat milk is usually better or olive oil better than some other oils.  I find that in my case if I only keep to all the above I can lose the weight. If I don’t, then it starts coming back.

Will all those who practise non-Christian religions go to hell?

Everyone who dies without being reconciled to God appears before the Judgment Seat dressed so to speak in their own works and invariably there will be imperfections and sins such as separate the human being from God. In the Bible this metaphor of righteousness being like clothing is expressed in the verse “all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags” (Isaiah 64:6). Religion per se has little, if anything, to do with it.

The offered way to be reconciled to God is to accept Jesus’ death on our behalf as our only hope. We have our hearts set so as to not plead any deserving of our own but are taught that if we have believed in him and repented of our sin, He stands for us as a perfect sacrifice, and there isn’t any other such perfect sacrifice as He is both God and Man, the only bridge between us and the Father. He takes our filthy rags on Himself and gives us robes that are washed white in the Blood of the Lamb.

If you think that you are good enough to get into heaven without relying on what Jesus did, you are effectively saying to God that what Jesus did is not your plea. Effectively you are pleading innocent but without being innocent. Or, you are maybe pleading that other works you did paid for the bad things. You don’t want to see that even these good things were also done with a sinful mind, with pride and other mixed motives. And they were things you should have been doing anyway, they don’t pay anything back to God for when you failed. Only Jesus’ blood can do that. Your plea that you also did good works is not balanced out against your crimes any more than you can escape a fine for speeding by saying you had driven within the speed limit quite a lot that day. If someone stands in as the driver and takes the punishment themselves, though, then you are in the clear. They won’t offer two fines for the same infraction. In a mortal court that would be seen as perverting the course of justice, but in divine justice this is allowed because Jesus did this in love, because if not for that you had no chance to escape hell.

People in Christian churches, people convinced that they are practicing the Christian religion also need to be convinced in their hearts that they have no deserving even if they have done many good works and avoided many of the egregious behaviours of those around them. The yardstick by which you will be judged is not the pathological family you look down on at the supermarket, but the perfect righteousness of a holy God. You don’t measure up, you need to place all your reliance on Christ’s sacrifice. If you do not, then it is merely academic that you are not a Muslim, Buddhist or outright atheist. We are Christians when we have placed all of our trust in Christ alone, and been justified only by our faith in what He did on Calvary. I am not speaking here only about sacerdotal, ritualist churches, the same mentality can affect people even in the most theologically sound Evangelical churches. Salvation is between you and Jesus, has He stood in for you on Calvary? If not, then sorry, but your destiny is the same lake of fire that applies to the most benighted pagan. Jesus says “Woe unto thee, Chorazin! woe unto thee, Bethsaida! for if the mighty works, which were done in you, had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes” (Matthew 11:21).

If someone never heard about Jesus or had such a lot of lies told to them that they had no possibility to know the above truth, then God, who knows their hearts and minds better than they know themselves, is perfectly able to assess them based on what they would have done had they known this truth about Jesus. So someone who didn’t actually reject the gospel, never having heard it but who has felt in their heart that they deserve to be rejected by God unless God in love somehow forgives them, along with those who die in infancy, or are mentally unable to conceptualise these truths, most likely these people will be saved by God’s mercy. In such cases Christ’s sacrifice is imputed to them. Were this not the case then few of the Old Testament Jews would be saved either. But they knew “blessed is the man to whom the Lord imputeth not iniquity” from Psalm 32:2. Paul also reference this verse applying it to the Gospel in Romans 4:6. Paul says that this righteousness of Christ’s was available even in the times ay before He arrived on earth, much less was crucified and resurrected, for God has known all along what the solution to sin will be, even Adam was told that his seed would bruise the serpent’s head.

We cannot rely on this passive and ignorant salvation, though, whenever we have someone in front of us who doesn’t know the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Those on whom God set His seal are thirsting and dearly waiting to know the person and the work of Jesus and to hear His voice in the New Testament. So we preach like eternal life or eternal damnation depend on it, whenever we have someone before us who is seeking the truth. Those who know Jesus and have accepted Him receive a peace and assurance they lacked before. Those who have had the Gospel preached to them fully and have encountered the person of Jesus in the words of others, spoken and heard or written and read, these are without excuse and if they neglect so great a salvation, how shall they escape? Such the writer of the epistle to the Hebrews asks, in chapter 2 verse 3, and it is, of course, a very good question.

Anyone who does not accept the Gospel of Christ, having heard it, even in such a condensed form as I have given in this answer, should ask themselves that question. What other escape do you think you will find, if not the cross on which your very Creator died for you?

Post for the start of Lent

It has been some time since this blog, or indeed my other blogs have seen much active content.

This is largely due to the effect of lifestyle changes that go along with the move to Zielona Góra, the running of an agrotourism ranch with Elena, namely Agroletnica, as well as an increase in activity in the audit market post Covid which I also would not like to miss out on, as well as several other factors.

Today is the first day of Lent, it is Ash Wednesday. My colleague went early to church and recounted to me afterwards the sermon he heard relating to Lent not only being a time to repent of one’s sins but also to focus more on doing good.

Certainly part of “metanoia”, the New Testament term for repentance, is a desire to please God, even though we cannot please God other than by reflecting Jesus back at the father and being thankful and loving Jesus.  With this mindset, motivated by faith, our walk will surely please the Lord.

Metanoia, the change of mind, doesn’t mean a casual alteration of our opinion, but the entre shift of perspective form what pleases us, selfishly, to what pleases God.

In a sense it is like the change that happens in the child from the id and ego mind to the super-ego (parental voice) mind in Freudian terms, but Christians know that this is merely a type of what happens in the change of mind when our true Father changes the heart so that the perspective is now to see what we have been in terms of how God views the sin, which automatically brings both a disgust at our own past failures as well as the determination to improve and to please God the best we poorly can.

When it comes to the world, however, there is no way to please them.  Now in this media age more than ever people try to be popular, strive to do what the bible terms “men pleasing”, but in fact society these days is set up in such a way that it is impossible to please them.

St Paul tries to “be all things to all men, so that he by all means might save some”, resulting in the old phrase, “you can’t please all the people all of the time”. It seems to me though that now there is simply no pleasing certain people. There are some voices who are now dictating the culture in western society who will never be happy with the Christian no matter what he or she does, and there is nothing we should be surprised about with that, neither should we kow-tow to their modern shibboleths.

For example, if you say that you support indigenous people to maintain their own cultures, then you will be blamed for bringing the Gospel to those places as it undermines their cultures. The statement that indigenous cultures of peoples untouched by the Gospel should be protected is one they might agree with, but you would have no right to make it without that comeback. They of course woud love to flood their cultures with Communist literature, but they have never really made a very good job of that on their own and only ever piggy-backed on the work of Christians who transcribed languages using their Shoebox program, described grammars, prepared dictionaries, opened schools, translated Bibles, etc. They cannot flourish without the planting work done by Christians any more than Globodera nematodes can if nobody plants potatoes, but that doesn’t stop them branding what we do as imperialist, colonising, etc etc etc.  We should not be contaminating these indigenous cultures, they say.

If we say that the Western Christian culture is also good and has a right to exist uncontaminated, then we are accused of being on the far right, practically Nazis or Ku Klux Klan.

If we say in that case we will adopt some elements of these native cultures and then wear headdresses or anything like that (which I advise against by the way as some have occultic significance of which we may be unaware) then the kettle really begins to whistle, because this is “cultural appropriation”. We aren’t good enough to adopt their culture, but they are allowed to adopt ours but only if they want to.

Basically they hate Christian legacy and will do anything to oppose it, because their thinking is straight from the devil.

If you try to help in Africa, you are an unwanted “white Saviour” as Communist David Lammy said against Stacey Dooley in recent history. If you don’t, then you are a hard hearted hypocrite.

You cannot win, with them, the only way to win, as the movie says, is not to play.

They say that cats are contrary creatures and my mother used to say that the best way to make a cat like you is to ignore them completely. In the case of the Godless left, ignoring them won’t make you like them either, but it may be at times the only way to deal with them.

Of course, we need to give them the Gospel, but the model of our Lord was to send the disciples out and if the message was scorned like that, they were to shake the dust from off their feet and take it elsewhere.

This may remind us of the dust and the ashes that we place on our heads at the start of Lent. We are but dust, the dust and ashes of the burnt whole sacrifices reminds us of the cross of Jesus so some people put an ash cross on their foreheads.

 

We have to recognise that the humility of the Saviour is such that He will stoop to save the lowest, but the dignity of the Saviour is such that we ought not to leave Him stooping as he is mocked and put to scorn.